<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michelle A. Heath &#187; Social Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michelleaheath.com/category/social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michelleaheath.com</link>
	<description>Social Media Marketing Maven</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 01:41:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>An Old Spice Guy, A New Way to Market</title>
		<link>http://michelleaheath.com/2010/07/an-old-spice-guy-a-new-way-to-market/</link>
		<comments>http://michelleaheath.com/2010/07/an-old-spice-guy-a-new-way-to-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 01:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Heath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4ps of marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing mix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old spice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelleaheath.com/?p=446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you haven&#8217;t heard about the Old Spice video campaigns you must be either living under a rock or rendered speechless by Isaiah Mustafa&#8217;s six-pack, towel wearing bod. Some say he&#8217;s a god. I say the campaign is brilliant (and happen to concur with the god-like references). Weiden + Kennedy, P&#38;G&#8217;s ad agency, pulled together [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you haven&#8217;t heard about the Old Spice video campaigns you must be either living under a rock or rendered speechless by Isaiah Mustafa&#8217;s six-pack, towel wearing bod. Some say he&#8217;s a god. I say the campaign is brilliant (and happen to concur with the god-like references). Weiden + Kennedy, P&amp;G&#8217;s ad agency, pulled together one of the most integrated and truly buzz worthy social media campaigns of 2010. Their timeliness, randomness, and honest-to-goodness humor has put Old Spice on the map in terms of social media. Instead of me gushing about it, feel free to read the great articles by <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/07/15/old-spice-social-media-campaign/" target="_blank">Mashable</a> and <a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/1670314/old-spice-youtube-videos-wieden" target="_blank">Fast Company</a>. But of course my $0.02 anyway.</p>
<p>As I thought about what worked so well in this campaign, I kept thinking about the 4Ps of marketing and how, in this new social media world, we need a new P. Sure, every successful marketing mix has something to do with product, price, placement and promotion. But what they don&#8217;t teach you is what we learned this week about a healthy dash of social media and a heaping helping of a hot guy in a towel.</p>
<p>As marketers, we spend most of our time cooking up clever ways to share our brand with the people we think are most interested &#8211; a.k.a. our target audience. Whether it&#8217;s chocolates, cars, ShamWows or Forex &#8211; there&#8217;s a buyer for what we&#8217;re selling. They just don&#8217;t know it yet.</p>
<p>Brands have to work harder than ever to earn our attention. We&#8217;ve all heard the urban legend of the viral video that refused to produce the golden YouTube views and its silent death at the hands of its maker. Tragic. We&#8217;ve all seen the Facebook pages that vie for us to like them only to disappoint us and the Twitter streams that offer nothing of value in 140 characters or less. Sigh.</p>
<p>The great thing about the Old Spice campaign is that it took something that&#8217;s been around for decades (my grandpa wore it for years) and made it new by starting with fans and followers. It is what every good campaign should do &#8211; start with the people and let them build it. It&#8217;s something they don&#8217;t teach you in school but something I admire in practice. IMHO, People should be the 5th P. Think about it. Social media is all about People. It&#8217;s about engaging People in conversations, creating new ideas, forming and sharing opinions and connecting. These are People who may or may not like your brand. But, they know other People. And when they see and hear cool stuff in action, they tell them.</p>
<p>Hats off to W+K for focusing on the People and to Old Spice taking a risk and putting a hot guy in a towel (seriously, thank you.) And because I work for <a href="http://blog.currensee.com/2010/07/as-promised-our-old-spice-video/">Currensee</a>, a social network where we admire great examples like this one&#8230;AND because we are a little goo-goo for social media, we decided to ask (and by ask I mean, make) <a href="http://twitter.com/OrliPe">one of our interns</a>, appropriately named Orli, respond to one  of the Old Spice commercials. Watch the original <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSXoihgnli8" target="_blank">here</a>.  Then watch Orli&#8217;s <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkml1n9KyQE" target="_blank">response</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michelleaheath.com/2010/07/an-old-spice-guy-a-new-way-to-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prince goes crazy and says the internet is over</title>
		<link>http://michelleaheath.com/2010/07/prince-goes-crazy-and-says-the-internet-is-over/</link>
		<comments>http://michelleaheath.com/2010/07/prince-goes-crazy-and-says-the-internet-is-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Heath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelleaheath.com/?p=424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remember my job at Fidelity back in the late 90&#8217;s. We were cooking up this revolutionary new way for people to trade&#8230;online. It was back in the day when you sometimes paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for a url and every website had a little worker guy image on it because it was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember my job at Fidelity back in the late 90&#8217;s. We were cooking up this revolutionary new way for people to trade&#8230;online. It was back in the day when you sometimes paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for a url and every website had a little worker guy image on it because it was under construction.</p>
<p>I remember how many people at that time said it would never happen, this internet fad. It will never take off. Who wants to go on the internet to shop? Who <img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-451" title="Picture 3" src="http://michelleaheath.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Picture-3-150x150.png" alt="Picture 3" width="150" height="150" />would ever give their credit card across the world wide web, into the ether? Why would people rather talk online than on the telephone? Well, friends, if you are living in the year 2010, you are living the internet dream. We are connected 24&#215;7 and it&#8217;s getting easier and easier to shop, communicate, browse and work.</p>
<p>But there always has to be someone who doesn&#8217;t believe it. Along comes Prince, who I love dearly. My first album that was banned from my record player by my parents was Purple Rain. I think I know every word to every song on that album. The man is a musical genius and has millions of fans around the world but refuses to embrace technology and went so far as saying <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/07/06/prince-the-internet-is-over/">the internet is over in a recent interview picked up by Mashable</a>. And, he went on to say</p>
<blockquote><p>All these computers and digital gadgets are no good. They just fill your head with numbers and that can’t be good for you.</p></blockquote>
<p>It is hard to believe that there are smart, influential, talented people out there who believe that the internet is the root of all evil. What about all of the great things the internet has does to open business and commerce? To connect people around the world? To create access to information? To make music available to fans everywhere?</p>
<p>Maybe we&#8217;ve all fallen prey to the cult of Steve Jobs, and Facebook, and iTunes and Twitter and the many gadgets and websites we use every day to help us do our jobs better, live better, learn more and be more productive members of society. Maybe we should go back to our pre-internet days and forget all the gizmos, gadgetry and websites.</p>
<p>&#8230;on second thought, I&#8217;ll stick with the cult. Sorry Prince, I ain&#8217;t buyin&#8217; it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michelleaheath.com/2010/07/prince-goes-crazy-and-says-the-internet-is-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marketing your differentiator</title>
		<link>http://michelleaheath.com/2010/03/marketing-your-differentiator/</link>
		<comments>http://michelleaheath.com/2010/03/marketing-your-differentiator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Heath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerson College]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product differentiators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelleaheath.com/?p=366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spent this morning at Emerson College participating on a panel as part of the School of Communication&#8217;s &#8220;Communication Week&#8221;. The Chair of the Emerson Marketing Communications department, John Davis, is passionate about hybriding the strategic and communication aspects of marketing and is building an experienced team of faculty, alumni and outside peers and influencers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spent this morning at Emerson College participating on a panel as part of the School of Communication&#8217;s &#8220;Communication Week&#8221;. The Chair of the Emerson Marketing Communications department, <a href="http://johnadavis.typepad.com/">John Davis</a>, is passionate about hybriding the strategic and communication aspects of marketing and is building an experienced team of faculty, alumni and outside peers and influencers to enhance the program. I must admit, I didn&#8217;t know much about Emerson&#8217;s Marketing program and was very impressed by the faculty and students, along with <a href="http://twitter.com/cathywaters">Cathy Waters</a>, Emerson Graduate Marketing Director.</p>
<p>The topic was around the role of marketing in today&#8217;s globalized world. I had the pleasure of meeting fellow panelist,  <a href="http://www.schneiderpr.com/blog/">Joan Schneider</a>, president of Schneider Associates. It&#8217;s amazing that our paths haven&#8217;t crossed until today as she is also a passionate marketer and creative brand thinker &#8211; and we tend to agree on alot of points, which is nice when you&#8217;re sitting next to someone for almost 2 hours. The conversation kicked-off around launching new products, something Joan and her firm know alot about. Being in start-up land at <a href="http://blog.currensee.com/">Currensee</a>, launches usually happen over-night, or so it seems. Joan talked about launch planning and how she helps her clients get ready. Her advice? Start the launch planing while ideas are still ideating. Waiting until the widget comes off the assembly line is often too late to plan all the details and line up the pieces for a successful launch. I spent time talking about launching a social network and how to gain sign-up momentum. The key? Identifying your influencers &#8211; the people who are willing to try your product early and tell other people about it. Joan and I both agreed that influencers are everyone from mommy bloggers, to WSJ press to the average consumer. It&#8217;s all about figuring out who they are, how to connect with them and what helps them engage with your brand.</p>
<p>We talked alot about social media and how we are using Twitter, Facebook and other social channels to engage customers and how we measure the success of social media. It was a topic that picked up on the themes from last week&#8217;s <a href="http://www.brandinfiltration.com/dailygrind/2010/03/19/social-media-marketings-dreaded-m-measurement/">Espresso </a>lunch with friend and colleague, <a href="http://bonafidemarketinggenius.com/">Marta Kagan</a>, where we talked about how social media is creating new channels and new challenges for us as marketers. Before, customers wrote an email or called us to complain. Now we manage the trials and tribulations of upset customers who can do more to damage to a brand in 140 characters than we ever thought possible. Measurement of social engagement, awareness, lead gen and membership is blurring the lines of ROI and marketers often don&#8217;t have the time or budget for big measurement products and, quite frankly, they&#8217;re not always the answer to the measurement question.</p>
<p>After a great discussion that&#8217;s far too detailed to transcribe here, we opened the session to the audience, mostly comprised of students. There were some great questions:</p>
<p>- What do you do when you have a bad press launch? How do you measure that and communicate that to your clients/management team?</p>
<p>- How do you decide what level of writing is appropriate for an audience mixed with newbies and experts?</p>
<p>- How do you find the influencers who can help launch your brand?</p>
<p>- What advice do you have for finding an internship or full-time job?</p>
<p>The last question really stood out to me because it takes marketing full-circle. Marketing is all about identifying the differentiator &#8211; the value prop that makes your idea, brand, product or service unique from the other guy&#8217;s down the street. Then, once you figure out what that is, you write it down and convey it in everything you do &#8211; consistently and emphatically. You talk about it, you Tweet it, you find people to talk about it. The <em>it</em> is the differentiator and the differentiator is the marketing. When it comes to getting a job, the same rules apply. You send me a resume. I look at it. The marketer in me does a few things immediately &#8211; 1) Assess the design. Did you just use a Word doc template or did you actually get creative and create a logo or unique format? 2) Check for typos and grammar. I know, it&#8217;s so anal but I can&#8217;t stand typos in a resume. You want me to hire you but you don&#8217;t have the attention to detail to actually proof your resume before you send it to me? Trash can.  3) Scan to figure out what&#8217;s different about you. Oh, you know Word, Excel and PowerPoint&#8230;yawn. Oh, you were the captain of your lacross team? Hm, team player, competitive, interesting. Oh, you were a sugar plum fairy in the Nutcracker Ballet? Discipline, focus, practice, cool. You started a mentoring program for inner-city kids? Initiative, compassion, giving back. Love it. You did an intership for the summer? Gave up the beach for the office. That&#8217;s dedication.</p>
<p>In my book, you have about 30 seconds for your resume to either get my attention or not. I apologize that I have the attention span of a gnat when it comes to stuff like this but I know I am not alone. People are busy. You need to cut through the clutter and create your difference. Whether you&#8217;re marketing yourself or a product someone&#8217;s going to buy, you&#8217;ve got 30 seconds to get your differentiator across, get them to understand it and make them feel like they need it (or you) right now.</p>
<p>And, now, over to you. Are you marketing your differentiator?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michelleaheath.com/2010/03/marketing-your-differentiator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do people really talk on the iPhone?</title>
		<link>http://michelleaheath.com/2009/11/do-people-really-talk-on-their-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://michelleaheath.com/2009/11/do-people-really-talk-on-their-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Heath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelleaheath.com/?p=289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did it. I finally did it. I know, you&#8217;ve all been giving me crap forever about my Blackberry. Some made fun of it&#8217;s phallic trackball, others it&#8217;s lack of app power, still others its inability to play music or even take a darn picture for that matter. Many asked why I wouldn&#8217;t switch. My [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did it. I finally did it. I know, you&#8217;ve all been giving me crap forever about my Blackberry. Some made fun of it&#8217;s phallic trackball, others <img class="alignright size-full wp-image-330" title="Picture 57" src="http://michelleaheath.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Picture-57.png" alt="Picture 57" width="113" height="114" />it&#8217;s lack of app power, still others its inability to play music or even take a darn picture for that matter. Many asked why I wouldn&#8217;t switch. My answer? 1) Don&#8217;t want to switch from Verizon to AT&amp;T  2) Don&#8217;t want to give up my keypad.</p>
<p>Well, on Sunday, November 15th, I did both.</p>
<p>As for #2, actually, surprisingly, it wasn&#8217;t that tough of a switch. Mind you, I have small hands (not sure how you big guys do it) and the auto-correction works pretty well, for the most part. I&#8217;ve put my thumbs to work and have gotten pretty good at typing pretty fast. The interesting thing I&#8217;ve found about typing on the iPhone is that I need to concentrate much more than I did on my Blackberry. My Blackberry was like typing on a computer &#8211; you know where the keys are, you could be putting on lipgloss and talking to your boss and still typing fast and furious. On the iPhone? Well, not so much. I have not yet attempted to apply gloss and type but have tried to talk to my boss and type (sorry, Dave) and it requires more concentration on the actual letters I&#8217;m trying to press. I know this sounds weird but it&#8217;s true and I guess I&#8217;ll get used to it so I can, once again, talk to Dave while typing.</p>
<p>As for #1, here&#8217;s my opinion. This device is not a phone at all. It is a mini-computer in disguise which is why the zillions of people who have iPhones just say &#8220;Yeah, AT&amp;T sucks, but what are you gonna do?&#8221; Nada, that&#8217;s what you&#8217;re going to do. You&#8217;re going to fall in love with the slick display and the shiny buttons (mmm&#8230;shiny). The swift touchscreen action, the skakey-shakey to refresh Facebook, the endless app store, the iTunes all in one place, and the list goes on. You&#8217;ll notice I never said&#8230;the phone.</p>
<p>There was an interesting and timely <a href="http://twitter.com/jowyang">Twitter post</a> today by <a href="http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/">Jeremiah Owyang</a> where he asked&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>What percent of the time do you use your phone to actually talk? I use iPhone maybe only 5-10% for talking.</p></blockquote>
<p>To which @<a href="http://blog.stroutmeister.com/">Aaron Strout</a> RT&#8217;d and said he uses his phone &#8220;about the same&#8221; and <a href="http://pop-pr.blogspot.com/">@jspepper</a> said &#8220;Talk on iPhone??!&#8221;. Jeremiah later posted&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Most responses were they use their &#8220;phone&#8221; as a device/computer now.   And the iPhone voice capabilities are substandard.</p></blockquote>
<p>But isn&#8217;t the thing called an i&#8230;Phone?</p>
<p>You see, I talk on the phone. Alot. I have blown-out every wireless plan I&#8217;ve ever had. The interesting thing that happened on Sunday when I <img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-315" title="Picture 48" src="http://michelleaheath.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Picture-48.png" alt="Picture 48" width="149" height="91" />got my iPhone is that I started talking on the phone less and using email, text, chat and other communication methods to &#8220;talk&#8221; to my peeps. I guess between email, text, Facebook, Twitter, Four Square and the other apps I haven&#8217;t even discovered yet, I can know where they are, what they are doing, what they had for lunch, where they&#8217;re meeting for drinks (mmm&#8230;drinks) and how they feel about the lastest celebrity drama. I can open attachments of all shapes and sizes, browse webpages and take pictures and share them on Twitter.</p>
<p>So, I ask you my new lovely, are you really a phone? I hear you ring every once and a while but, IMHO, you are not a phone. You are a shiny, beautiful gateway to helping me share more stuff with more people. Whether that sharing is through a Word doc, text message, song, photo, geo position or a simple virtual gift, it&#8217;s less about talking on the phone and more about sharing on my device.</p>
<p>Maybe you should have been called the iShare? Hm, that has a nice ring to it. <img src='http://michelleaheath.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><span style="color: #888888;"><em>*iPhone photo credit: weboptimiser.com</em></span><cite style="font-style: normal;"></cite><span style="color: #888888;"><em>; Rotary phone <span style="color: #888888;">photo credit: </span></em></span><span style="color: #888888;"><em>cornbreadandbeansquilting.wordpress.com</em></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michelleaheath.com/2009/11/do-people-really-talk-on-their-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Financial services innovation is alive and kicking at Finovate 2009</title>
		<link>http://michelleaheath.com/2009/09/financial-services-innovation-is-alive-and-kicking-at-finovate-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://michelleaheath.com/2009/09/financial-services-innovation-is-alive-and-kicking-at-finovate-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Heath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Start-ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Shrink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BrightScope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Currensee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finovate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smarty Pig]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelleaheath.com/?p=204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally posted on the Currensee blog on Sept. 15, 2009.
I spent most of my career in the financial services industry. Back in the day, when I was working at one of the &#8220;big guys&#8221;, we were truly innovative. New products, new technologies, first to market on many fronts but then something changed. The big guys [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Originally posted on <a href="http://blog.currensee.com/2009/09/financial-services-innovation-is-alive-and-kicking-at-finovate-2009/">the Currensee blog</a> on Sept. 15, 2009.</p>
<p>I spent most of my career in the financial services industry. Back in the day, when I was working at one of the &#8220;big guys&#8221;, we were truly innovative. New products, new technologies, first to market on many fronts but then something changed. The big guys got big and when you get big, you get hung up in meetings, politics, reorgs, red tape, managing up, reforcasting budgets and, voila, all the big innovation gets pushed aside for making the numbers and keeping the beast steady as she goes.</p>
<p>When I took the leap into the land of startups I never imagined a financial services vertical for startups. I wondered what there was to innovate in a place so layered in compliance, risk, security and privacy hangups? Well, first I discovered <a href="http://www.currensee.com">Currensee</a>, and was charmed and delighted by the innovation and technology in the space. Then, most recently, I came across <a href="http://www.finovate.com/">Finovate</a>.</p>
<p>For those of you who know <a href="http://www.techcrunch50.com/">TechCruch50</a> or <a href="http://www.demo.com/">DEMO</a>, Finovate is the financial services equivalent. A Spring and Fall yearly event (NYC, Sept 29) that &#8220;showcases the best new financial and banking technology innovations from established leading companies and hot young startups.&#8221; The Finovate judges hand-pick the companies that get their 7 minutes of fame on stage to show (live demos only, no slideware) their latest and greatest to an audience filled with VCs, big financial services companies looking for ideas and other startups watching the competition.</p>
<p>After checking out several of the companies, I was pretty impressed. I loved <a href="http://blog.smartypig.com/">Smarty Pig</a> &#8211; simple, smart savings plans and accounts you can create with your family and friends. And, <a href="http://www.brightscope.com/blog/">BrightScope</a> &#8211; transparent information and ratings for your 401k plan.  Then there&#8217;s my favorite, <a href="http://www.billshrink.com/blog/">Bill Shrink</a> &#8211; where Dave in Witchita found a cell phone provider that will save him $500 a year. Now, that&#8217;s smart.</p>
<p>The best news in reviewing all the Finovate finalists is that they are all in the same business &#8211; making life simpler and better. That&#8217;s where the big guys often miss the boat. When you connect to the real goal of the average investor it is, quite simply, to have a damn, good life. I am loving the fact that financial services startups are connecting to this reality, cooking up unique products and services and serving up a solid dose of innovation. We&#8217;re happy to share the financial services startup space with these exciting companies and putting Finovate on our horizon for 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michelleaheath.com/2009/09/financial-services-innovation-is-alive-and-kicking-at-finovate-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A letter to Twitter: Porn Spam Must Die</title>
		<link>http://michelleaheath.com/2009/08/a-letter-to-twitter-porn-spam-must-die/</link>
		<comments>http://michelleaheath.com/2009/08/a-letter-to-twitter-porn-spam-must-die/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Heath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porn spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelleaheath.com/?p=184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Twitter,
I am writing to you on this steamy New England day to vent my frustration, annoyance and overall dismay at the increase in porn spam over the past two months. I joined Twitter on October 29, 2007, long before Oprah joined and spam bots found yet another channel to clog up with their crapola [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Twitter,</p>
<p>I am writing to you on this steamy New England day to vent my frustration, annoyance and overall dismay at the increase in porn spam over the past two months. I <a href="http://www.whendidyoujointwitter.com/">joined Twitter</a> on October 29, 2007, long before Oprah joined and spam bots found yet another channel to clog up with their crapola messages.</p>
<p>As Chris Brogan penned in his <a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/twitter-must-stop-the-spam-use-of-apis-now/">recent post</a> on Twitter spam, &#8220;&#8230;This is less-than-useful. This is the kind of behavior that will encourage me to pull back my participation on the platform.&#8221; Amen, Mr. Brogan.</p>
<p>Even with all the celebrity hype, <a href="http://michelleaheath.com/?p=129">jump the shark commentary</a> and bandwagoning going on, I am in the camp of people who happen to find Twitter useful and I Tweet on a pretty regular basis. For those of us who do <a href="http://michelleaheath.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/picture-12.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-194" title="picture-12" src="http://michelleaheath.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/picture-12-300x118.png" alt="" width="300" height="118" /></a>find value in your service, you need to figure out a way to keep the spam out, especially the porn. If half of my followers in a day are named Ellie69 or HotChick87 with messages like: &#8220;Bored!add me: myspacecica69@hotmail.com&#8221;, I will quickly grow tired of blocking them and cleaning-up after their mess. It degrades the experience for avid Twitter users and is something you guys need to focus on, especially considering that <a href="http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2009/06/report-most-twitter-users-dont-tweet-dont-follow-anyone.ars">most Twitter users never tweet and don&#8217;t follow anyone</a>.</p>
<p>So, what&#8217;s it going to be Twitter? Do you care to invest the time, money and energy to ban the porn spam? Or, do you let it continue and watch your frequent users fall into the never-tweet abyss?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michelleaheath.com/2009/08/a-letter-to-twitter-porn-spam-must-die/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are you marketing to stand out or stand back?</title>
		<link>http://michelleaheath.com/2009/07/are-you-marketing-to-stand-out-or-stand-back/</link>
		<comments>http://michelleaheath.com/2009/07/are-you-marketing-to-stand-out-or-stand-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Heath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelleaheath.com/?p=169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mission: Tell your target audience who you are and what you do.
I&#8217;m the marketing chick. I come equipped with a designer bag full of tricks. There&#8217;s Twitter, Facebook, blog posts, email campaigns, partner marketing, affiliate programs, you know the drill. But, there&#8217;s alot of noise. If you post a Tweet to 1,000 followers, do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mission: Tell your target audience who you are and what you do.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m the marketing chick. I come equipped with a designer bag full of tricks. There&#8217;s Twitter, Facebook, blog posts, email campaigns, partner marketing, affiliate programs, you know the drill. But, there&#8217;s alot of noise. If you post a Tweet to 1,000 followers, do they hear it? In my opinion, not so much. So, my mission is less about getting the message out and more about <em>standing</em> out.</p>
<p>I watch my six year old with her friends. They pretty much do everything that the other person is doing, wearing, saying. Their mission? To be the same. Standing out is scary when your six. You could be placed on exile island during recess by the mean girls who are all the same. Most brands act like six year olds. Oh, we can&#8217;t say that or someone might be offended. Hm, we can&#8217;t show that or we might get sued. Jeez, we can&#8217;t suggest that or someone might think we&#8217;re not professional or perhaps semi-crazy.</p>
<p>What a load of crap.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t the whole point to create your differentiator and stand-out? As my friend, Alex Neihaus, so poignantly penned in <a href="http://www.yobyot.com/general-musings/currensee-gets-it/2009/07/15/">his blog post</a> yesterday:</p>
<blockquote><p>In high tech marketing, the “blend” is everything. You gotta have creativity… you gotta have authenticity…and given that small tech startups are either a) a completely new idea and/or b) trying to unseat titans, you gotta have balls to make your point. Big ones.</p>
<p>And my friends at <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.currensee.com');" href="http://www.currensee.com/" target="_blank">currensee.com</a> have ‘em. Watch this video. In just 1:02, you get it all in the blend. The beans (what currensee.com is), the roasting (it’s a social network for currency traders) and the infusion of…well…<em>tush </em>into the blend. If you don’t smile — and then head right over to the site — it’s definitely your problem.</p>
<p>My hat’s off to Dave and Michelle for ignoring all the reasons marketers come up with <em>not</em> to stand out and delivering their message (make more money trading money with a group) with a liberal dose of authenticity and humor.</p></blockquote>
<p>As you&#8217;ll see from my latest <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WACzNjhrbKo">&#8220;project&#8221;</a>, I put the big ones to the wall and admittedly teeter on the edge of controversial, sexist and down-right inappropriate. At the end of the day, producing another campaign or line of copy can only get you so far. I say, take a risk, put it out there, make your mark and have some fun. I sure did. <img src='http://michelleaheath.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WACzNjhrbKo&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WACzNjhrbKo&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michelleaheath.com/2009/07/are-you-marketing-to-stand-out-or-stand-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alltop &#8211; all but useful</title>
		<link>http://michelleaheath.com/2009/07/alltop-all-but-useful/</link>
		<comments>http://michelleaheath.com/2009/07/alltop-all-but-useful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Heath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alltop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy Kawasaki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelleaheath.com/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been trying to give Alltop a chance. It has content. I like content. It&#8217;s all in one place. I like convenience. It&#8217;s a Guy Kawasaki venture. I like Guy.
But I&#8217;ve gotta say. I&#8217;m just not a fan. I&#8217;ve been trying to figure out the point of this seemingly dumbed-down headline aggregator launched in March. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to give <a href="http://alltop.com/">Alltop</a> a chance. It has content. I like content. It&#8217;s all in one place. I like convenience. It&#8217;s a <a href="http://twitter.com/GuyKawasaki">Guy Kawasaki</a> venture. I like Guy.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;ve gotta say. I&#8217;m just not a fan. I&#8217;ve been trying to figure out the point of this seemingly dumbed-down headline aggregator launched in March. I keep hoping maybe I&#8217;ll be surprised with some great gem or some great nugget of information. But I keep coming back disappointed and, quite frankly, feeling a bit appeased.</p>
<p>Let me explain. If you haven&#8217;t used Alltop, you start by clicking on a category that interests you. You can<a href="http://michelleaheath.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/picture-12.png"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-162" title="picture-12" src="http://michelleaheath.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/picture-12-300x191.png" alt="" width="300" height="191" /></a> search for something, click the actual word, or click on the letter. Easy, peasy. Let&#8217;s say you want to stay on top of the latest headlines on the topic of &#8220;Frugality.&#8221; Well, I found a great article with <a href="http://www.frugalvillage.com/2009/06/17/tips-for-stretching-meat/">Tips for Stretching Meat</a> (sounds painful) or <a href="http://www.thefrugallifenews.com/2009/06/removing-tar-from-brick.html">Removing Tar from Brick</a> (a must-read). If those weren&#8217;t enough to satisfy my hunger for content, I tried&#8230;you guessed it&#8230;bacon. Who doesn&#8217;t love bacon? But do I really need to see the <a href="http://theoriesofbacon.blogspot.com/2009/05/in-bacon-we-trust.html">Religious Side of Bacon</a> (in bacon we trust) or try out <a href="http://www.womansday.com/Articles/Food/Top-10-Innovative-Ice-Cream-Flavors.html">Bacon Ice Cream</a> (um, that&#8217;s just gross)?</p>
<p>So, I tried to think about why we need Alltop. Guy Kawasaki is a pretty smart guy so there must be some reason to keep up on the latest bacon news, sappy quotations, quilting tips or even acne articles. Then I realized it must be less about what it contains and more about who is using it. For those of us who have multiple RRS readers, Twitter, Facebook, FriendFeed and a bunch of other ways to gather headlines, news and the latest goings-on, Alltop seems pretty jay-vee. But, maybe if you&#8217;re the type of person who wants to go to one place to search and find the latest benign topics, Alltop could be a useful tool. I said Maybe.</p>
<p>I give it two-thumbs down. Sorry, Guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michelleaheath.com/2009/07/alltop-all-but-useful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Oprah Twitter&#8217;s shark?</title>
		<link>http://michelleaheath.com/2009/04/is-oprah-twitters-shark/</link>
		<comments>http://michelleaheath.com/2009/04/is-oprah-twitters-shark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Heath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelleaheath.com/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jumping the shark. Risky, dangerous and often fatal. The question is&#8230;can Twitter gracefully jump the shark and survive?
I have love this idea of jumping the shark. It is such an interesting phenomenon &#8211; one which doesn&#8217;t happen that often. I didn&#8217;t know much about where the term came from so I did a little research [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jumping the shark. Risky, dangerous and often fatal. The question is&#8230;can Twitter gracefully jump the shark and survive?</p>
<p>I have love this idea of jumping the shark. It is such an interesting phenomenon &#8211; one which doesn&#8217;t happen that often. I didn&#8217;t know much about where the term came from so I did a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jumping_the_shark">little research</a> (god love Wikipedia.) The term was born from a 1977 <em>Happy Days</em> episode where The Fonz jumps a shark wearing swim trunks and his trademark leather jacket. If your shaking your head, your not alone. It makes no sense <a href="http://michelleaheath.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/picture-41.png"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-135" src="http://michelleaheath.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/picture-41.png" alt="" width="207" height="261" /></a>what so ever and appears that the producer was just grasping for material. Ends up that it was a pivotal episode and the producer, Garry Marshall, later admitted that &#8220;that he knew the show had lost something as the crew prepared to shoot the scene.&#8221; The show went on to produce another 100 episodes but things were never quite the same as those early Fonzerelli days.</p>
<p>Think about all the shows that you once loved that eventually died a slow death &#8211; plot lines thin out, bizarre characters are introduced and the quality of the show plummets. This sad but true happening transcends TV into our everyday lives. In my opinion, Starbucks (tho I love it so) has jumped the shark. Quality is not consistent and they&#8217;re everywhere. Used to be I&#8217;d literally walk a mile for a perfect non-fat latte. Now, I walk across the street and hope I get the &#8220;good latte&#8221; barista. As it relates to technology, who can forget the PDA &#8211; come on, you had one of these right? Oh, the little stylus and all my contacts in one place but holy crap. They completely missed the boat and got lost in the innovation of the smart phone. My kids now pay with mine and pretend it&#8217;s a Blackberry:) And who can forget the Walkman. Man, I thought I was so cool walking around holding my Walkman listening to my 80&#8217;s mix tape. Then along comes an MP3 player and out goes my Walkman with the trash.</p>
<p>So, now let&#8217;s talk about Twitter. I set up my Twitter account, thanks to the early-adopteritis of my friend <a href="http://nathanwburke.com/">Natty B</a>, back in the Fall of 2007. I had no idea what Twitter was, checked it out and said to Nathan: &#8220;Who really cares what I&#8217;m eating for lunch??&#8221; Seriously, I just didn&#8217;t get it. But, I am social media girl and decided to give it a whirl. Put up my first tweet and was off following the few people I knew had any clue what Twitter was. I think I had a few handfuls of followers and the conversation was, for the most part, interesting. Lots of social media tips, ideas, news flashes, personal updates &#8211; I was in the groove. Then Twitter exploded with the digerati and the music set at SXSW in early 2008. My CEO started tweeting, we set up a corporate account and all my colleagues at matchmine (RIP) got in the groove too. It started to become useful in keeping up with people, getting interesting news and facts and learning more about how people think.</p>
<p>Fast forward to today, April 17, 2008. Some call it &#8220;Twitter&#8217;s big day.&#8221; Ashton Kutcher is on Oprah and is announced as the first &#8220;mainstream&#8221; user with over 1MM followers. Let&#8217;s just stop here &#8211; since when is Ashton mainstream? He is not a normal person on Twitter. He is a celebrity. Two very different things. And 1MM followers. BFD. How many does he know personally? I bet 4 &#8211; Ryan Seacrest, Oprah, Demi and Oprah&#8217;s dog.</p>
<p>Now let&#8217;s talk about the Oprah-effect. She can, in one show, make something jump the shark. I have to give it to her &#8211; that is some power, girlfriend. She has Twitter CEO, Evan Williams, on the show along with Ashton and BAM, in one day, I got about 50 new followers &#8211; 90% of which are, I hate to say it, total crap. I don&#8217;t have time to get to know these people and, quite frankly, I have nothing in common with any of them. Do I really care about some lady who likes to knit and is from Nebraska or some former weightlifer-turn-personal trainer who can pump me up? Does that make me a Twitter snob? Maybe. I find myself saying: &#8220;Remember when Twitter was&#8230;&#8221; It must be like the first person to have any of the deadpool devices listed above. Were they so over their Walkman when everyone had one? You betchya. That&#8217;s the way this whole thing works. The question now is what happens to Twitter? Can they jump the shark or is it so over? I have another theory on this but I&#8217;ll save it for a future post.</p>
<p>In the meantime, what&#8217;s your take&#8230;has Twitter jumped the shark or do they still have their Fonzarelli mojo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michelleaheath.com/2009/04/is-oprah-twitters-shark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pie and the secret of sharing</title>
		<link>http://michelleaheath.com/2009/02/pie-and-the-secret-of-sharing/</link>
		<comments>http://michelleaheath.com/2009/02/pie-and-the-secret-of-sharing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Heath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelleaheath.com/?p=105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems we are encouraged at a young age to share. I am constantly telling my 2.5 year old to &#8220;be a good sharer&#8221; and &#8220;share with other people so they will share with you&#8221;. But, let&#8217;s face it. Sharing is just not natural. It&#8217;s learned and not everyone get&#8217;s on the sharing-means-caring bus.
I&#8217;m a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems we are encouraged at a young age to share. I am constantly telling my 2.5 year old to &#8220;be a good sharer&#8221; and &#8220;share with other people so they will share with you&#8221;. But, let&#8217;s face it. Sharing is just not natural. It&#8217;s learned and not everyone get&#8217;s on the sharing-means-caring bus.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a good sharer. I love to share food &#8211; put a bunch of different plates in front of me and I&#8217;m in heaven. I always share my last piece of gum and I will let you borrow my clothes as long as you promise to bring them back in the same shape you borrowed them in (yes, I know). But it wasn&#8217;t always like this. Back in the day, I was a horrible sharer. So bad that I wrote the word &#8220;PIE&#8221; on all of my things &#8211; Baby Alive, Malibu Barbi, Easy Bake Oven, Raggedy Anne &#8211; PIE, baby. Why PIE? Who the hell knows. Pie is yummie, I guess. So, if it said PIE, it was mine. My sister remembers this phase fondly and didn&#8217;t give a crap about PIE and tried to use my stuff anyway. It wasn&#8217;t a pleasant stage. Well, luckily the PIE-phase passed (though my mom still has the dolls with PIE written across their foreheads) and I am the sharer I am. How did that happen? What changed? I am sure there are a bunch of you behavioral psych folks out there who can tell me why it changed, so come on and let us in on the secret.</p>
<p>For the rest of us, let&#8217;s fast forward to the here and now.  <img src="file:///C:/DOCUME~1/AMICHE~1/LOCALS~1/Temp/moz-screenshot-4.jpg" alt="" /> So, along comes Web 2.0. The &#8220;social&#8221; era. What&#8217;s it all about&#8230;.you betchya, sharing. Photos, profiles, music, friends, walls, lifestreams, hobbies, resumes, tweets, videos the list goes on. What makes some share and others adamant PIE-er? Here&#8217;s my $.02.</p>
<p>1. Privacy. This is probably the biggest reason. A guy in my office (who will remain un-named) will not disclose a photo of himself to anyone but his immediate family. I completely cannot relate but it&#8217;s his right to keep it to himself. I often wonder &#8211; is it the worry of what could happen if said photo hits the net and is used to begin stalking him? Or is it something simpler &#8211; perhaps a discomfort with putting yourself out there. I&#8217;ve even heard of the suppressed &#8220;Catholic Guilt&#8221; theory. In any case, people have their own reasons and for that they get the PIE stamp.</p>
<p>2. Time. Many of the non-sharers I talk to say it&#8217;s a waste of time. Who has time to share photos or tell people what they had for lunch? Well, then, how do you explain the droves of people on Facebook and Twitter? They have time. Some of them, yes, too much time on their hands. Others, like me, juggle a million different things and social media is just a natural part of the day. Like checking my email or sending a text message or getting my latte. It is how I live.</p>
<p>3. Aversion to change. Can&#8217;t teach an old dog new tricks. This is true with the people out there who just can&#8217;t change. These are also the people who say they have nothing to say. Everyone has something to say. Come on, people! These are also the people who don&#8217;t see the value in sharing, they don&#8217;t care and they&#8217;ll argue till the death against it. To them I say, bleh.</p>
<p>4. Generation. Age definitely plays a factor. How many of our parents are on Facebook? or iLike? or Twitter? or FriendFeed? My guess is a very small percentage. My 60 year old uncle sees Facebook as a privacy disaster waiting to happen and a good way to start a high-school girl fight (he&#8217;s a high school teacher). My dad is still trying to figure out how to upload his photos to Snapfish and send me an email to tell me I can view them. Then I see some of my friends&#8217; dad on Facebook and wonder, would I want my dad seeing me out on the town partying it up? Hm, not so much.</p>
<p>5. Lifestyle. There are people out there who just aren&#8217;t in the know. Yes, I know, dear reader, it&#8217;s hard to imagine. I have a friend from high school who just got email. Yes, I said email. It&#8217;s beyond me but some people just don&#8217;t have the lifestyle desire to get on the technology or the sharing bandwagon.</p>
<p>So, what does all this lead to. Well, if sharing is caring, what does what you share say about you? Are you a frequent Facebook status up-dater or are you more of a lurker who is present but not participating? If you’re<a href="http://michelleaheath.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/sharing.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-110" title="sharing" src="http://michelleaheath.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/sharing-300x248.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="248" /></a> a sharer, what’s the quality of what you share? People are fickle. They want to be engaged and entertained. When your posting, writing, uploading &#8211; think about the quality of your content and what it says about you. If you’re a sharer, take the quality of what you’re sharing to the next level. If you’re still in PIE-mode, come on now. Maybe you can take a baby step. Try out a social media site and see what it’s like to connect with a few new people or find out something new about someone you already know. Sharing makes you a contributor. The old way of learning was very one-dimensional. Now, I learn every day thanks to social media and people who share. New websites, products, ideas, personal updates &#8211; I have the ability to take it all in and decide how to use it. That makes me smarter and that makes me happy. Be smart. Be happy. Be social.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michelleaheath.com/2009/02/pie-and-the-secret-of-sharing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
